Well...
I can writte an ideal prog, it's small in size, fully relocatable, don't trashes registers and have no bug at all
jmp $





Ret


No one can Beat me, :alright: :grin: , Your program did infinite Loop, Im not.
Posted on 2003-09-16 07:11:51 by realvampire
Okay,

Your program doesn't do anything right....so real program........hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

But what about this:

INT 19h

it's only 2 BYTES, and the shortest real program I can think of,
a Bootstrap loader.
:)
Posted on 2003-09-16 10:54:00 by The SharK
...Which will unfortunately fail to work in a lot of situation.
Posted on 2003-09-16 11:23:04 by f0dder
Originally posted by realvampire


Ret
No one can Beat me, :alright: :grin: , Your program did infinite Loop, Im not.
What???
Your program doesn't do anything
So think I :grin:

But my program does real work: it's running
:grin: :grin: :grin:

But I'm not so smart to write something bigger :o
Posted on 2003-09-16 18:18:04 by S.T.A.S.
int3 ; call debugger :grin:
Posted on 2003-09-16 19:30:59 by bitRAKE
thanks for destroying my dreams :(

I'll be back. Just a ...years :tongue:
Posted on 2003-09-16 19:49:29 by S.T.A.S.
I wonder why no one mentioned 'Privalov' yet... he got my vote.
Posted on 2003-09-18 10:41:39 by bazik
Yes,I vote also for Privalov.
Posted on 2003-09-18 12:32:34 by Vortex

I wonder why no one mentioned 'Privalov' yet... he got my vote.


Yea, try to look at the pyramid of Heops too close, let's say from 25cm. Did you can see how great is it? ;)
Thank you bazik, that pull me 1km back. :)

I vote for Privalov too. He is the man! :alright: :alright: :alright:
Posted on 2003-09-18 13:00:02 by JohnFound
how do you define "best"? If it is "who meant/contributed the most", iczelion would apply, and perhaps hutch too. If it is "who is most skilled with assembly" neither would apply - and abrash wouldn't rate too high either. Bitrake, privalov and The Svin would rate rather high no matter what... but still, it all comes down to the terms.
Posted on 2003-09-18 17:23:19 by f0dder
Hehehe, f0dder, you ran in to a E8079 too? :P :)
Posted on 2003-09-18 23:40:43 by scientica

how do you define "best"? If it is "who meant/contributed the most", iczelion would apply, and perhaps hutch too. If it is "who is most skilled with assembly" neither would apply - and abrash wouldn't rate too high either. Bitrake, privalov and The Svin would rate rather high no matter what... but still, it all comes down to the terms.


"who is most skilled with assembly" AND "who meant/contributed the most"

Iczelion and Hutch contributed for many things, but they are more leaders, than programers. Show me one big Hutch's source, or Iczelion's. Iczelion have 20 post's on this board and his tutorials are only for beginers. It's a great work to attract beginers to assembly programing, but very soon the beginers becomes "advanced" and they don't need tutorials anymore. Then what???

regards.
Posted on 2003-09-19 01:04:13 by JohnFound
but very soon the beginers becomes "advanced" and they don't need tutorials anymore. Then what???



THEN, we ALL are PROFESSIONALS :grin:
Posted on 2003-09-19 01:17:12 by The SharK
I'm amazed people actually take this seriously :)
Posted on 2003-09-19 04:19:30 by Hiroshimator
Hi, Hiro. :)

In every joke, there is a piece of earnest. ;)
The trick is, to understand both. ;)

Regards.
Posted on 2003-09-19 07:58:05 by JohnFound