Does MS still support MASM.
I went to their website and all they had one one page with a MASM patch. And info on how to us MASM in C/C++
I went to their website and all they had one one page with a MASM patch. And info on how to us MASM in C/C++
As far as I know, masm is no longer a separately sold product.
But they include masm eg. in the visual studio processor pack.
But they do update masm. It's even in the new .NET stuff I think.
But they include masm eg. in the visual studio processor pack.
But they do update masm. It's even in the new .NET stuff I think.
Even Borland dosen' support TASM, these guys think asm is dead, except for C++ add ons
Anunitu
Anunitu
f0dder is correct MASM is in VS.NET, and MS does fix bugs and update the program. The compiler isn't that good, yet. Compilers seem to work at either a very low level or at a high level, when it comes to code generation - they get lost when it comes to bringing it all together. MASM will be needed for some time. It would be nice if they released the source code - I would like to fix a couple things. It's not worth it to recode the whole program from scratch. :grin:
bitRAKE,
Would that be an assembler remake?
Anunitu
Would that be an assembler remake?
Anunitu
thanks for the response.
Im slowly learning about assembly and system orginization
Im slowly learning about assembly and system orginization
There is a new version of MASM included with Visual Studio .NET. It is version 7.0.9372.1. This is the RC1 version of VS .NET.
:)
Charles
:)
Charles
ML.EXE 7.0 is also in the WinXP DDK - so are all the 7.0 tools to program in ASM/C/C++.
BitRAKE, do they include their compiler in the XP DDK? Or is this only
the beta 64bit compiler?
the beta 64bit compiler?
Yes, whole ball of wax, for $16 shipping! VC++ minus the V.
Standard version or the one with the optimizer, though? (Guess I
should go download the XPDDK myself instead of all these questions,
huhu :grin: )
should go download the XPDDK myself instead of all these questions,
huhu :grin: )
How could I find that out f0dder?
I couldn't find the XPDDK for download?
I couldn't find the XPDDK for download?
Aha. I thought it was... 98 and NT/2k DDKs are/were... oh well, if
it's not available now, it'll probably be in the future.
it's not available now, it'll probably be in the future.
I like the new BUILD.EXE utility - used with NMAKE it's very handy. I don't know if it was in previous versions of the DDK, but it's new to me. ;) Cool tool for building projects in many pieces.
Hello bitrake,
The XP DDK version is 7.0.9210.0. The RC1 version is a bit newer than that. I wonder what the differences are, and I wonder if the release version will be different as well.
Charles
The XP DDK version is 7.0.9210.0. The RC1 version is a bit newer than that. I wonder what the differences are, and I wonder if the release version will be different as well.
Charles
Yes cdquarles, but the files are exactly the same besides the version numbers - doesn't appear to be much changing on this end of things. ;)
VS.NET beta 2 = 7.0.9254.0
VS.NET beta 2 = 7.0.9254.0
Hi bitRAKE,
Here is a link for XP DDK version 7.0.9210.0 :
<snip snip snip>
Here is a link for XP DDK version 7.0.9210.0 :
<snip snip snip>
buliaNaza, first of all you should not post links to exetools here.
Second of all, you should (for ****s sake) not post the exetools
ftp password anywhere! Let people register on the forum if they
want the pass!
Second of all, you should (for ****s sake) not post the exetools
ftp password anywhere! Let people register on the forum if they
want the pass!
buliaNaza, thanks for the help, but it should be obvious from the posts that I have the XPDDK - at this time it is not free for download from M$. It was worth it for me to buy the CD, and I am fortunate enough to be able to afford the $16 shipping and handling.
Hi f0dder,
I don't care about the rules of the wa*ez sites
because I buy all my software and wonder why
you (as a moderator) protect 'em...
I don't care about the rules of the wa*ez sites
because I buy all my software and wonder why
you (as a moderator) protect 'em...