.code
depth = 0
__odd_mul macro reg1,reg2,oddcmul
LOCAL n,i,ii
;%echo @CatStr(<%oddcmul>)
% n = oddcmul
if n gt 1
depth = depth + 1
n = n - 1
i = 0
; makeOdd
while (n and 1) eq 0
n = n shr 1
i = i + 1
endm
n = __odd_mul (reg1,reg2,n)
ii = 1 shl i
if n eq 0
if depth gt 1
if i le 3
lea reg2,[reg1*ii+reg1]
else
mov reg2,reg1
shl reg2,i
add reg2,reg1
endif
else;if depth eq 1
if i le 3
lea reg1,[reg1*ii+reg1]
else
mov reg2,reg1
shl reg1,i
add reg1,reg2
endif
endif
else
if depth gt 1
if i le 3
lea reg2,[reg2*ii+reg1]
else
shl reg2,i
add reg2,reg1
endif
else
if i le 3
lea reg1,[reg2*ii+reg1]
else
shl reg2,i
add reg1,reg2
endif
endif
endif
n = 1
depth = depth - 1
exitm <n>
else
exitm <0>
endif
endm
mul_ macro reg1,reg2,mulconst
LOCAL n,i
n = mulconst
if n eq 0
xor reg1,reg1
else
depth = 0
if (n and 1) eq 0
i = 0
; makeOdd
while (n and 1) eq 0
n = n shr 1
i = i + 1
endm
if i eq 1
add reg1,reg1
else
shl reg1,i
endif
endif
if n gt 1
i = __odd_mul(reg1,reg2,n)
endif
endif
endm;test usage:
xi = 123
mov eax,1
mul_ eax,ecx,xi
sub eax,xi
.if !zero?
;bug
.endif
i was playing around and wrote this
i hope there are no bugs
drizz,
What do those two MACROs do? How about some documentation. How do they work? What is the purpose of your posting? Ratch
i was playing around and wrote this
i hope there are no bugs
i hope there are no bugs
What do those two MACROs do? How about some documentation. How do they work? What is the purpose of your posting? Ratch
mul_ macro decomposes multiplication by constant to sequence of
shl,add lea instructions
reg1 is reg you want to mul , reg2 is trash reg
for example
mul_ eax,ecx,7 ; produces =>
lea ecx,
lea eax,
mul_ eax,ecx,10 ; produces =>
add eax,eax
lea eax,
mul_ eax,ecx,100 ; produces =>
shl eax,2
lea ecx,
lea eax,
the result is not alwasy optimal
shl,add lea instructions
reg1 is reg you want to mul , reg2 is trash reg
for example
mul_ eax,ecx,7 ; produces =>
lea ecx,
lea eax,
mul_ eax,ecx,10 ; produces =>
add eax,eax
lea eax,
mul_ eax,ecx,100 ; produces =>
shl eax,2
lea ecx,
lea eax,
the result is not alwasy optimal
drizz,
OK, now I get it. See the link below. Ratch
http://www.azillionmonkeys.com/qed/amult.html
OK, now I get it. See the link below. Ratch
http://www.azillionmonkeys.com/qed/amult.html
i know about his work (the best), but i thought was
convenient to put it in a macro,
so when you code, put
mul_ eax,ecx,sizeof SOMESTRUCT
convenient to put it in a macro,
so when you code, put
mul_ eax,ecx,sizeof SOMESTRUCT
quite smart, but what is the use of it? for cpu's where the mul part of the core got damaged? :-D
lifewire, good point, but you see it's not much different from your
way of coding smallest size possible code :wink: . i tend to write
smallest exec. speed possible code.
way of coding smallest size possible code :wink: . i tend to write
smallest exec. speed possible code.