ML615, ml614 have such problem...

type bl    ;; returns wrong value if program includes too many macros, so does dl and ch...

while ml611 is ok.

How could that happen?
Posted on 2005-08-02 23:41:55 by jemin
I posted the answer in the msmforum, the TYPE operator is broken in 6.14 - 6.15 on BYTE size data. I pasted in a mcro that does not have the problem for any x86 register.
Posted on 2005-08-02 23:49:18 by hutch--
Thank you. I read that.

And I'd found a nice web... http://www.movsd.com :)


Ml615 and ml614 work <type bl> fine if my code is very small, that's a implicit damage.
Posted on 2005-08-03 05:12:22 by jemin