For what operating systems do you programm in assembly? Is there any system for x86 that fasm does not support and you think should support in the future?
Both for Win32 and DOS.
Privalov,is it possible to redesing the DOS version of FASM for WinXP?
I don't want to use a DOS emulator,I think it's not practical.
I hope i am not agressive with the DOS problem,thanks for your herculean
efforts for developing FASM.
Regards,
Vortex
Privalov,is it possible to redesing the DOS version of FASM for WinXP?
I don't want to use a DOS emulator,I think it's not practical.
I hope i am not agressive with the DOS problem,thanks for your herculean
efforts for developing FASM.
Regards,
Vortex
I'm doing programs for Win32, and I'm trying to learn to make programms under linux (trying = modifying existing exmaples to see what happens).
If I find some good tut on howno make "windows" under linux (GNOME or KDE3, or some other method) (i found some messy c++ example, but it was far too messy to understand :( ) then I'll probably make some "real" apps for Linux, but there is a lot to learn...
So, I'm programming for win32, trying to program under Linux (the same stage as I were in window$ a number of months ago...) .
Vortex, tried fasmw (the GUI one)? I love it (and it runns under Linux (in Wine) too)
If I find some good tut on howno make "windows" under linux (GNOME or KDE3, or some other method) (i found some messy c++ example, but it was far too messy to understand :( ) then I'll probably make some "real" apps for Linux, but there is a lot to learn...
So, I'm programming for win32, trying to program under Linux (the same stage as I were in window$ a number of months ago...) .
Vortex, tried fasmw (the GUI one)? I love it (and it runns under Linux (in Wine) too)
Vortex, FASM rans as a Win32 Console app under windows. It should run just fine under WinXP.
hi all,
Actually I started programming for dos and know I'm programming win32 applications
amr
Actually I started programming for dos and know I'm programming win32 applications
amr
Vortex, FASM rans as a Win32 Console app under windows. It should run just fine under WinXP.
The problem is about the 16-bit DOS assembler.(FASM for DOS)
Every FASM version has the same functionality, no matter what OS is issued for.
In a no so far future (I hope)...http://www.openbeos.org/
I've never developped for BeOS. I have used it occassionally and I find it simply wonderful.
Personally I see a bright future also in solarOS.
I've never developped for BeOS. I have used it occassionally and I find it simply wonderful.
Personally I see a bright future also in solarOS.
Whats really strange is that the poll shows more people code for dos than linux:eek:
Yes Gladiator,some of us still coding for DOS.We like DOS,why not? :)
Yes Gladiator,some of us still coding for DOS.We like DOS,why not? :)
GUI.
it (a GUI) can be made under DOS, look at win95... (it's a GUI (and bugs) on DOS :tongue: )
ahem, but still i dont get why would anyone want to code for DOS. Sure GUI's can be made but so can aeroplanes:)
Why not take advantage if the existing GUI and the Win32 api. I personally dont like using interrupts over the apis.
Why not take advantage if the existing GUI and the Win32 api. I personally dont like using interrupts over the apis.
why would anyone want to code for DOS
Because he would have to run his programs on 386SX machine with 2 MB of RAM.
And please don't underestimate the power of DOS! ;)
My kelvar example runs on 386SX 2MB with VESA 1.2 compatible graphic card.
Well, DOS is stable, if something crashes blame the program that just ran...
(and you'd want to choose DOS when you realize it isn't M$ own, IIRC M$ had somethin' to do with CP/M...)
Well, the linux assembly isn't an option for you (int 80h, dear int 80h; AFIK you can do the must with int 80h)...
Why, becuase you might want to make an stable, nice looking, better GUI your self....
(and you'd want to choose DOS when you realize it isn't M$ own, IIRC M$ had somethin' to do with CP/M...)
"Why not take advantage if the existing GUI and the Win32 api. I personally dont like using interrupts over the apis."
Well, the linux assembly isn't an option for you (int 80h, dear int 80h; AFIK you can do the must with int 80h)...
Why, becuase you might want to make an stable, nice looking, better GUI your self....
Yes amigos,Win32 is the champion! (Naturally)
Why I see from 58 votes?
Why I see from 58 votes?
Maybe because a moderator edited the poll... I didnt :/
Because you are allowed to vote for more that one OS.